Instrumental Music...less preference in india???

Posted in Muziboo Lounge

Original Post
Harsha_solo3

Harsha Jade said

ok….Im a Pianist( i can also sing ..but only in the shower:-p)..had classical piano training….Now i Play/perform pop to clasical to bollywood songs….in the style i feel is my expression…but WHY in india does instrumental covers not sell?? ppl seem to like it…but very few artists..Brian Silas was the only one
Is too much importance being given to singers???

Posted 11 months ago

Replies (6)
Sponsored Link
Smile
Vasudha Sundar said

Just two days back, there was an article in THE HINDU about this. It is music in chennai and mos of the halls ar wpcked to only vocal music.

WHy instumentalist dont get much importance. When it comes to classical music, i think it is important that one understznds the song or even know the lyrics to relate and feel the music or sing along. In instuemntal, i guess if one does not the know the song apriori , it may be diff to hold his/her attentionf or long.

It depends on the instument and artist also.
For example, veena is a very tough instrument and one would see very rare veena concerts . Flute , mandolin and violin are better received.

I think, instumental has to be more encouraged and ore people should opt to learn it for this to get accepted

Posted 11 months ago | Permalink
Me
Prasanna K said

I love instrumental stuff. Especially Carnatic instrumental. Somehow Carnatic vocal doesn’t appeal to me, perhaps it’s cos I consider it elitist, with lyrics typically in some non-local language.

I like percussion, and you can imagine how difficult it is to find carnatic percussion tracks :). It’s easier to find mandolin, or even guitar, but they’re also not quite enough ;).

I feel instrumental tears away all kinds of pretensions in music. It’s just the raw basic form which you receive. The cycles and rhythms and variances are (for me) easier to appreciate in their nakedness.

That’s not to say I don’t like vocal :). Just that I can’t appreciate carnatic vocal as much as carnatic instrumental.

Posted 11 months ago | Permalink
Smile
Arun Raja said

It could also be the cost factor.. 15 years back when I was trying to learn the Mridhangam, none of my 20 class mates owned one.. it was around 1500 rupees worth.. so when you cannot own one, and if you have to go to the teacher’s house to practise it, your interest starts waning slowly… but the condition is getting better in India now-a-days…well Harsha even now I cannot own a Piano..

Posted 11 months ago | Permalink
Dsc01809
Shashank Gokhale said

I am not expert in analysis..but according to me this could be the reasons:

1. It depends on what form of music audience listen everyday…mostly they are songs…mostly audience use to what they ‘show’ on channels…So bottomline is Instrumental music is NOT visible as songs…

2. Listening to instrumental music need some kind of Listening sense…Which need time…which is the most expensive aspect…Nobody has time to get their heads into ‘understanding’ music….

3, Songs are popular than instrumental music becuase song has ‘LYRICS’...so if people doen’t understand MUSIC from a song…they like the RHYMING part of the song….which they can reproduce from their voices…instrumental music is not ‘CHANTABLE’ as it doent have lyrics….very few can remember the melody without lyrics…

4. There is no much alertness of a organising Instrumental Music Shows in India…apart from few Music Maestros very few get chances to perform in front of audience…and they get publicities through local news papers and NO Electronic media….So ‘Out of sight out of mind’ principle causing Instrumental music to become less popular….

etc. etc. to be Continued….

Posted 11 months ago | Permalink
Harsha_solo3
Harsha Jade said

Its overwelming to see people actually pouring out their views…i agree on a number of points…i was analysing this whole thing…compare western and indian clasical music…..western has separate pieces for vilin , pian, cello, guitar…and duets, orchestra, trio..so on..which means the music was writen exclusively for these instruments….but in indian…most pieces are composed for voice..later an instrumentalist plays it in the same style on his chosen instrument…look at artists like yanni, Richard clayderman, David Lanz…they have sold millions and promoted instrumental music for bout 20 years now…i dont see that hapening in India at that scale….very sad!

Posted 11 months ago | Permalink
Harsha_solo3
Harsha Jade said

And i completely agree with Vasudha and Shashank…people readily relate to vocals…but actually its the tune/ melody that makes a song…only lyrics is just poetry!!!...its a musical Paradox:-p

Posted 11 months ago | Permalink


Please Login to reply to Instrumental Music...less preference in india???
Related Discussions
FUSION MUSIC group

tell abt urself...

In FUSION MUSIC

2 Replies | 382 Views

Original Music group

Coments

In Original Music

1 Replies | 145 Views

Questions On Muziboo group

One Small Suggestion

In Questions On Muziboo

1 Replies | 377 Views

Swar Foundation group

HORIZON SERIES

In Swar Foundation

0 Replies | 296 Views

Original Music group

please listen to my song

In Original Music

0 Replies | 201 Views